Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
«Брали каких-то кривых и не совсем уж талантливых. Ну, точно не выше меня ростом людей», — пожаловался Шаляпин.
，更多细节参见搜狗输入法2026
アカウントをお持ちの方はログインCopyright NHK (Japan Broadcasting Corporation). All rights reserved. 許可なく転載することを禁じます。このページは受信料で制作しています。
최현석 레스토랑 “노출 의상 자제해달라”…얼마나 심했길래
，详情可参考51吃瓜
Continue reading...
MarvelsGrantMan136。服务器推荐是该领域的重要参考